List what stays connected
Write down the laptop, phone and accessories that need power together. The individual maximum of a socket applies under its stated conditions, often with other outputs unused. A2667 and A2688 have the same number of sockets but different two-USB-C allocations. A shared-output table is therefore more useful than multiplying the largest figure by the number of ports.
Match the protocol as well as the watts
Power Delivery and PPS describe charging capabilities, not a universal charging speed. A2667 explicitly excludes one named 45 W phone charging mode despite PPS support. Check the device manufacturer requirements and an appropriate cable. Unknown PPS evidence stays unknown; do not turn a general fast-charging claim into a positive protocol result.
Check whether the cable is fixed, included or separate
UGREEN SKU 55897 includes a retractable USB-C cable, but the technical table limits that cable to 60 W while the separate USB-C socket reaches 65 W. Anker B2697 is a cable bundle, whereas the selected A2667 and A2688 offers exclude cables. Preserve the exact bundle and output identity; the product title alone does not settle every cable capability.
Allow for changes when another cable is attached
The four-output Anker limits its fully occupied arrangement to 134 W. A cable can also reserve part of a shared budget even when its device is not charging, as qualified in the manufacturer notes. Read the named combinations and remove unused cables when directed by the exact manual. Do not infer an undocumented allocation from arithmetic alone.
Use unresolved wording as a question to verify
The Belkin source gives inconsistent single-output wording while clearly stating its dual-output split. This comparison retains that disagreement. None of these records establishes an independent safety test, a measured full-charge time or guaranteed compatibility with a future device. Confirm the selected US plug, exact package and the source qualifications before depending on the arrangement.
Common questions
Can individual port maxima be added?
No. Use the documented simultaneous allocation for the exact outputs connected.
Were these chargers physically tested?
No. The catalogue uses manufacturer evidence and preserves unverified or conflicting details.
Sources & further reading
- 735 Charger Nano II 65W A2667 US specificationsChecked 2026-10-11
The standard US offer, output combinations and cable exclusion were read. No checkout, current stock or physical test.
- A2667 official support: US input and PPSChecked 2026-10-11
Model-specific support identifies US input, PPS and port allocations; legacy device examples are not a current universal compatibility list.
- Prime Charger A2688 100W US offerChecked 2026-10-11
The table reduces the three-output total to 89 W. Charging cables are excluded from the selected charger-only offer.
- A2688 official support: two-output allocationsChecked 2026-10-11
Named port combinations were read. A complete three-port split and PPS support are not established by this source review.
- 140W charger with USB-C cable: B2697 US bundleChecked 2026-10-11
The US page labels the cable bundle B2697 and links A2697 hardware documentation. Its weight wording conflicts, so no weight is authored.
- A2697 specification: four-port split and PPSChecked 2026-10-11
The model-specific English support content is served at a French-locale URL. It supplies hardware allocation, not US package contents.
- WCH013dqWH BoostCharge Pro 65W US offerChecked 2026-10-11
Body text says 65 W single-output, while a footnote refers to 45 W single-output. The single-output value remains conflicting; dual 45 W + 20 W is explicit.
- 65W retractable charger US SKU 55897Checked 2026-10-11
The technical table rates the attached USB-C cable at 60 W and the separate USB-C socket at 65 W. No unverified sharing diagram is transcribed.
See our methodology for source labels and limitations. Product evidence dates are shown beside the corresponding specifications.
Suggest a correction